有这么一个不算是笑话的笑话:任何社会问题,归根结底都会归结到体制问题。所以一些所谓公知的论点永远徘徊在制度周围,言之凿凿而气势咄咄,一言不合则代表人民审判你。殊不知被代表的那些人民本就忍气吞声,再毫无理由的被强行发声,其无奈天地可鉴。所以我觉得,人大与财政之争,实际上并非部门利益之争,而是被代表的“弱权”与执行之“强权”之争,是貌离神合的共同利益之争,甚至是防民之口甚于防川的政府与如鲠在喉不吐不快的平民甚至屁民之争。 There is such a joke that is not a joke: any social problem will, in the final analysis, be attributed to the institutional issue. Therefore, some so-called well-known arguments are forever wandering around the system. They are both assertive and assertive. When they say nothing, they judge you on behalf of the people. As everyone knows, those people whom they represent have swallowed their voices swiftly and then forced to speak without reason. Therefore, I think that the dispute between the NPC and the fiscal authorities is really not a dispute over the interests of the departments, but rather the dispute between the “weak power” and the “power” that is being implemented is a dispute over common interests Even the anti-Chinese government is even more fierce than the anti-Chuan government and rival civilians who thwart in the throat.