论文部分内容阅读
本刊1989年第4期刊登了陈尔泰同志《试论广播电视理论研究》一文后,同年第6期又刊登了蔡长宁同志的《广播电视“本论”研究浅析——兼与陈尔泰同志商榷》。本期我们再次刊登陈尔泰的《答蔡长宁同志》,同时刊登了雷跃捷同志的《学术争鸣应有科学的态度》一文,对陈尔泰的两篇文章都有所评论。我们认为,陈尔泰、蔡长宁、雷跃捷同志的文章,涉及到广播电视学的研究对象、研究方法以及对待学术争鸣的态度等问题,欢迎读者参与讨论。我们的宗旨是:一定要把争鸣引上健康的也就是科学的、民主的轨道。
In the fourth issue, published in 1989, Comrade Chen Taitai, “on the theory of radio and television research,” a text, the same year the sixth issue of Comrade Cai Changning’s “radio and television” theory “Research - to discuss with Comrade Chen Ertai ”. In this issue, we once again published “A Reply to Comrade Cai Changning” by Chen Er-tai, and published a commentary entitled “Academic Contention Should Have a Scientific Attitude” Comrade Lei Yuejie. Both articles of Chen Ertai commented on it. In our opinion, the articles by Comrade Chen Er-tai, Cai Chang-ning and Lei Yue-jie relate to the research subjects, research methods and attitudes towards academic debate in radio and television. We welcome readers to participate in the discussion. Our aim is: we must lead the debate to a healthy, scientific and democratic track.