论文部分内容阅读
检察官客观义务应当被看作是一项法定义务,唯有如此,才能从理论预设走向制度实践。新刑事诉讼法一方面扩大了检察机关的法律监督权,另一方面有关检察官履行客观义务的程序规定相当简约,由此造成了“权力—义务”的失衡,从而给义务履行带来制度性障碍。为此,应当从权力制约和权利保障两个维度来设计相关程序,主要包括完善辩护权保障、诉讼监督、撤回公诉、申请无罪判决、对公诉的司法审查以及诉讼关照义务等程序规则,以此增强制度刚性和实效性,为检察官履行客观义务提供坚实的程序保障。
The procurator’s objective obligation should be regarded as a statutory obligation. Only in this way can we shift from theoretical default to institutional practice. On the one hand, the new Criminal Procedure Law has expanded the legal supervisory power of procuratorial organs. On the other hand, the procedural provisions on procurator’s performance of objective obligations have been quite simple, resulting in an imbalance of "power-obligation Institutional barriers. To this end, the relevant procedures should be designed from the two dimensions of power restriction and right guarantee, which mainly include improving the procedural rules such as the protection of the right of defense, the supervision of litigation, the withdrawal of public prosecution, the application of acquittal, the judicial review of public prosecution and the obligation of litigation. Enhance the rigidity and effectiveness of the system and provide a solid procedural guarantee for prosecutors to fulfill their objective obligations.