论文部分内容阅读
包刚升认为,国家治理概念的起源与公司治理有关,其核心是形成官员与公民共同体之间激励相容的合约。陈慧荣认为,应该基于国家与社会互动的视角来理解国家建设,国家要超越和渗透社会,实现理性化、自主性和嵌入性;同时,社会应该通过法治与问责制两种机制实现对国家的制衡。总体上,国家与社会分享权力有助于提高国家治理水平。黄琪轩认为,有效的国家治理,一方面要防止土地及资本集团的经济权力向政治领域渗透,甚至控制政治领域;另一方面要防止政治权力向经济领域渗透,控制和垄断经济资源和机会。良好的国家治理应该在权力之间设置屏障,避免政治权力与经济权力二者相互转化。朱天飚认为,民族国家和资本主义的互动史其实是国家管理模式逐渐转型的历史,从统治者部分接纳社会到全部接纳社会,其间经历了一个从国家统治到国家治理的模式转型。历史地看,新自由主义未必会促进国家治理,相反两者之间存在着明显的张力。
Bao Gang just believes that the origin of the concept of state governance is related to corporate governance, and its core is to form an incentive-compatible contract between officials and citizens’ communities. Chen Huirong believes that we should understand the construction of a nation based on the interaction between the state and the society, that the state should surpass and infiltrate the society and realize its rationality, autonomy and embedding. At the same time, the society should realize the national Checks and balances. In general, the sharing of power between state and society helps to improve the level of state governance. Huang Qixuan believes that effective state governance should prevent the economic power of land and capital groups from infiltrating into the political field and even control the political field. On the other hand, we must prevent political power from infiltrating into the economic field and control and monopolize economic resources and opportunities. Good state governance should set a barrier between powers and avoid the mutual transformation of political power and economic power. Zhu Tian Biao believes that the history of the interaction between the nation state and capitalism is actually a history of gradual transformation of the state management model. From accepting the part of the ruler to admitting the whole society, it has undergone a model transition from state domination to state governance. Historically, neo-liberalism may not necessarily promote state governance, on the contrary there is a clear tension between the two.