论文部分内容阅读
目的 :通过比较不同空间能力个体三维立方体测验成绩 ,验证三维立方体测验的有效性并探讨言语能力对空间能力的影响 .方法 :采用认知分化成套测验和韦氏成人智力测验的言语测验对 82名健康男性大学生进行分组 ,比较各组三维立方体测验的成绩 ,对言语能力与空间能力进行相关分析 ,比较言语能力高、低各组空间能力的差异 .结果 :高空间能力组与低空间能力组在三维立方体旋转测验正确率 (CN)、平均反应时 (ART)和单位时间正确数 (CNPS)三项指标均存在显著性差异 ,高空间能力组明显优于低空间能力组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;全部被试CLB空间能力成绩与CNPS显著相关 (r =- 0 .2 6 9,P =0 .0 1 5 ) ,高、低空间能力被试CLB空间能力成绩与CN (r=- 0 .30 8,P =0 .0 4 2 )、ART (r =0 .333,P =0 .0 2 7)、CNPS (r=- 0 .4 35 ,P =0 .0 0 3)均有显著相关 .言语能力与空间能力无相关 .结论 :三维立方体测验对不同空间能力个体有着较好的区分度 ,是空间能力视觉化成分测量的较好指标 ;在同一性别中 ,言语能力对空间能力无明显影响
OBJECTIVE: To verify the validity of three-dimensional (3D) cube test by comparing the results of three-dimensional cube tests with different spatial abilities and explore the impact of verbal ability on spatial abilities.Methods: Eighty-two Healthy male college students were divided into groups to compare the results of three-dimensional cube test in each group, and to analyze the relationship between speech ability and spatial ability, and to compare the differences in spatial abilities of high-speech ability and low-ability groups.Results: The accuracy of three-dimensional cube rotation test (CN), average response time (ART) and the number of units per time (CNPS) three indicators were significantly different, high spatial ability group was significantly better than the low spatial power group (P <0 .0 (R = - 0.269, P = .015), space performance score of CLB in high and low space ability was significantly correlated with CN (r = - 0.26, P = 0.308, P = 0.042), ART (r = 0.333, P = 0.027), CNPS (r = - 0.355, P = 0.030) There was no significant correlation between verbal ability and spatial ability.Conclusion: There is a good degree of discrimination between individuals with spatial abilities, which is a good indicator of the visualization of spatial abilities. In the same gender, speech abilities have no significant effect on spatial abilities