论文部分内容阅读
竞技体育伤害行为存在于身体接触型对抗性比赛中。大陆法系刑法理论认为,竞技比赛伤害行为阻却违法。社会相当性说为竞技比赛伤害行为阻却违法提供了理论依据。竞技比赛伤害行为没有超出社会伦理秩序的范围,具有正当性。同时,社会相当性判断具有模糊化特征。因此,应当在社会相当性理论的指导下,明确竞技比赛伤害行为阻却违法应当具备的条件,即赛事条件、主体条件、主观条件、行为条件以及时空条件等。竞技比赛伤害行为阻却违法同样存在例外情形。竞技体育伤害行为的正当性应当被刑法典所认可。
Competitive sports injuries exist in physical contact confrontation games. Civil law criminal law theory that the competitive game impede illegal behavior. The social equivalence provides a theoretical basis for deterring illegal activities in competitive games. Injury in competitive games does not go beyond the scope of social ethics and is justified. At the same time, judging social equivalence has fuzziness characteristics. Therefore, under the guidance of the theory of social equivalence, we should make clear the conditions that should be possessed by the injury prevention activities in competitions, namely race conditions, subjective conditions, subjective conditions, behavioral conditions and temporal and spatial conditions. Injury to athletic competition obstructs the law There are also exceptions. The legitimacy of competitive sports injuries should be recognized by the Penal Code.