论文部分内容阅读
关于在秦始皇陵封土上有无享堂之类祭祀性建筑问题,在考古界曾有讨论。杨鸿勋同志根据殷周时期墓上建享堂的制度与中山国兆域图的有关研究,推测“秦始皇陵覆斗形的封土,可能是享堂多级中心土台‘墉’的遗存,即原来地面上可能是一座远较平山中山王陵更为庞大的高台建筑式样的享堂。”但在秦陵从事考古的同志持反对的态度,认为始皇陵封土上不存在建筑。其理由有三:一,墓上建享堂是殷周制度,春秋战国时已兴起冢墓。秦自献公、孝公之后,以及惠文、武、昭、孝文、庄襄五王一直沿用冢墓。秦始皇不
On the cemetery in the Qin Shi Huang Tombs enjoy the enjoyment of such sacrificial buildings, has been discussed in the archeology. Comrade Yang Hongxun, based on the study of the regime of Shangjiantang on the tomb in the Yin and Zhou Dynasties and the study on the trillion domain map of Zhongshan, presumed that “the tomb-covered loess of the Qin Shi Huang Tombs may be the remains of the earth station ’ On the ground may be a much larger than the Piedmont Zhongshan Tombs high tower style enjoy enjoyment. ”But in the Qinling archeology comrades opposed the attitude that the first emperor tomb enclosure does not exist buildings. There are three reasons for this: First, the tomb built on the hall is the Yin Zhou system, spring and autumn and the Warring States Period has been the rise of the tomb. Qin since Xian Gong, filial piety, and Hui Wen, Wu, Zhao, Xiao Wen, Zhuang Xiang five kings have been used graves. Qin Shi Huang not