近几年来,笔者在一些报刊上,常见诸如《教坛小议》、《法制小议》、《球边小议》、《环境小议》等栏目。与此同时,在这些栏目里,还见到以“小议”为标题的文章,例如“小议××”,或者倒过来,写成“××小议”。 报刊上辟“小议”栏目,发“小议”文章,无疑是重视言论的表现,这是应该加以肯定和鼓励的。但问题是,这里的“小议”栏目和“小议”文章,“小议”来,“小议”去,全是老面孔、旧模式,令人感到单调乏味。 In recent years, the author in some newspapers and magazines, common such as “teaching forum”, “legal discussion”, “ball side discussion”, “environment discussion” and other columns. In the meantime, in these columns, we have also seen articles titled “Discussion,” such as “discussing XX” or, in turn, writing “XX discussion.” It is undoubtedly a matter of attaching importance to the expression of speech in newspapers and periodicals that publish a “small discussion” column and send a “small discussion,” which should be affirmed and encouraged. However, the problem is that here the “small discussion” section and “small discussion” articles, “small discussion”, “small discussion” to go, are all old faces, the old model, it is tedious.