论文部分内容阅读
目前,古汉语学界关于上古汉语指示词“之”的语义属性尚未达成一致意见。我们认为,“之”回指类指名词或触发词的用法可以用约束理论中的约束变项来解释,由于它没有直指功能,只能在上古汉语的语篇中对先行词起照应作用,而在语义上与先行词并不共指,因而“之”在语义属性上并非表泛指,而仍然是有定性的指示词。“之”用于语篇中的照应时,在具体语境中体现出来的空间距离、时间距离、心理距离等意义并不明显,这说明它是一个指示性较弱的中性指示词。
At present, no agreement has been reached on the semantic attributes of the ancient Chinese language on the ancient Chinese indicator “”. In our opinion, the use of “nouns” or “nouns” can be explained by the constraint variables in the theory of constraints. Since it has no direct function, it can only be used in ancient Chinese discourse It does not refer to the antecedent in the sense of semantics. Therefore, the “” in the semantic attribute is not a general term, but is still a qualitative indicator. “” Is used in the discourse in the response, reflected in the specific context of the spatial distance, time distance, psychological distance and other significance is not obvious, indicating that it is a weak indicator of the neutral indicator .