In this study,a series of polyetherimide/SBA-15: 2-D hexagonal P6 mm,Santa Barbara USA(PEI/SBA-15) adsorbents modified by phosphoric ester based surfactants(including tri(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate(TEP),bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate(BEP) and trimethyl phosphonoacetate(TMPA))were prepared for CO_2 adsorption.Experimental results indicated that the addition of TEP and BEP had positive effects on CO_2 adsorption capacity over PEI/SBA-15.In particular,the CO_2 adsorption amount could be improved by around 20% for 45PEI–5TEP/SBA-15 compared to the additive-free adsorbent.This could be attributed to the decrease of CO_2 diffusion resistance in the PEI bulk network due to the interactions between TEP and loaded PEI molecules,which was further confirmed by adsorption kinetics results.In addition,it was also found that the cyclic performance of the TEP-modified adsorbent was better than the surfactant-free one.This could be due to two main reasons,based on the results of in situ DRIFT and TG-DSC tests.First and more importantly,adsorbed CO_2 species could be desorbed more rapidly over TEP-modified adsorbent during the thermal desorption process.Furthermore,the enhanced thermal stability after TEP addition ensured lower degradation of amine groups during adsorption/desorption cycles. In this study, a series of polyetherimide / SBA-15: 2-D hexagonal P6 mm, Santa Barbara USA (PEI / SBA-15) adsorbents modified by phosphoric ester based surfactants (including tri (2-ethylhexyl) phosphate BEP and trimethyl phosphonoacetate (TMPA)) were prepared for CO 2 adsorption. Experimental results indicated that the addition of TEP and BEP had positive effects on CO 2 adsorption capacity over PEI / SBA-15. In particular, the CO 2 adsorption amount could be improved by around 20% for 45 PEI-5TEP / SBA-15 compared to the additive-free adsorbent. This could be attributed to the decrease of CO 2 diffusion resistance in the PEI bulk network due to the interactions between TEP and loaded PEI molecules, which was further confirmed by adsorption kinetics results. In addition, it was also found that the cyclic performance of the TEP-modified adsorbent was better than the surfactant-free one. This could be due to two main reasons, based on the results of in situ DRIFT and TG-DSC te Sts. First and more importantly, the adsorbed CO 2 species could be desorbed more rapidly over TEP-modified adsorbent during the thermal desorption process. Ferrthermore, the enhanced thermal stability after TEP addition ensured lower degradation of amine groups during adsorption / desorption cycles.