论文部分内容阅读
欧盟通过98/27/EC和2009/22/EC指令建立了以保护消费者“集体利益”为目的、阻止和预防侵害消费者集体利益行为的禁制令制度。该制度在实践中取得了积极成效,但也反映出原告承担财务风险、申请程序耗时过长、不同性质的程序相互交织、裁判的效力不明及执行力不足等一系列困难。中国在消费者民事公益诉讼制度的构建中可借鉴欧盟经验,明确消费者保护领域的“公共利益”范围,适度开放原告资格并对其公益诉权予以规制,通过诉讼机制确保申请程序便捷高效,通过判决效力的有限扩张协调团体诉讼与消费者个体诉讼的关系,并通过多元纠纷解决机制的适用,促进消费者群体纠纷解决与权利救济价值的统一。
EU Directive 98/27 / EC and 2009/22 / EC established a restraining order system for the purpose of protecting consumers’ “collective interests” and preventing and preventing acts that infringe upon the collective interests of consumers. The system has achieved positive results in practice, but it also reflects a series of difficulties such as plaintiffs taking financial risks, long time-consuming application procedures, intertwined procedures of different nature, unclear validity of the judgments and lack of enforcement. In the construction of consumer civil public interest litigation system, China can learn from the experience of the European Union, clarify the scope of “public interest ” in the field of consumer protection, regulate the eligibility of plaintiffs appropriately and regulate their public interest litigation rights, and ensure the application process is convenient and efficient through the litigation mechanism , Coordinating the relationship between group litigation and individual consumer litigation through the limited expansion of judgment power and promoting the unification of dispute resolution and right relief value through the application of multiple dispute resolution mechanism.