论文部分内容阅读
随着中国—东盟自由贸易区的发展,中国与东盟企业之间的知识产权纠纷日益增加,而单一的诉讼解决方式已无法满足双方日益增加的知识产权纠纷需要。由于知识产权纠纷解决机制的公共物品属性、知识产权纠纷解决的诉讼垄断造成的社会净福利损失、以及纠纷解决机制的组合降险功能等,决定了替代性争议解决方式解决双方知识产权纠纷的必然性。当前中方企业应提高涉东盟知识产权纠纷的仲裁意识,选择合适的仲裁机构,采取不同的策略进行调解、和解,以解决双方间的知识产权纠纷。
With the development of the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area, the number of IP disputes between China and ASEAN enterprises has been on the increase. However, the single litigation solution has failed to meet the ever-increasing need for IP disputes. Due to the public goods attributes of IPR dispute resolution mechanism, the social net welfare loss caused by the litigation monopoly of IPR disputes and the combined risk reduction function of the dispute resolution mechanism, the inevitability of resolving IPR disputes between the two parties is determined. . At present, Chinese enterprises should raise their awareness of arbitration over intellectual property disputes involving ASEAN members, select suitable arbitration institutions and adopt different tactics to mediate and settle disputes so as to resolve the disputes over intellectual property between the two parties.