论文部分内容阅读
《独立评论》关于“无为政治”的讨论集中反映了国难当头的中国在建设与无为问题上的抉择窘况。面对濒临破产的生产力,“无为”论者主张暂时停止建设,以为农民赢得喘息机会。“建设”论者则强调,国难当头,别说停止建设,即使放缓建设的步伐也不啻在自讨覆亡。实际上,就建设与无为而言,不论作何选择,都不可能收到理想效果。不过,开展学术争论是知识分子表达社会关怀的重要方式,通过这种讨论,他们得以对社会政治生活中存在的弊端进行揭露和批判,并将自由主义的一些基本理念阐发开来。
The discussion of “Inaction Review” on “Inaction politics” has focused on the embarrassment of China in the wake of the national crisis over the construction and inaction. Faced with the productivity that is on the brink of bankruptcy, the “inaction” advocates temporarily halting construction and giving peasants the opportunity to wheeze. On the other hand, the “constructionist” emphasized that in the wake of the national crisis, let alone stop the construction, even if the pace of construction slow down, it will not be over. In fact, in terms of building and doing nothing, it is impossible to receive the desired result no matter what choice is made. However, carrying out academic controversies is an important way for intellectuals to express social concerns. Through this discussion, they can expose and criticize the shortcomings in social and political life and elucidate some basic concepts of liberalism.