论文部分内容阅读
维护某些客观价值、保障自由、在多元价值观之间保持适当的中立,似乎都应包含在现代法治的观念之中。但是,对于客观价值、自由与中立三者能否共存,在批判法学与自由主义之间,却存在着激烈的争论。它们的争论围绕着三个重要问题展开:第一,中立性问题;第二,中立性与价值主观性的关系问题;第三,中立性、价值主观性与法律客观性的关系问题。批判法学与自由主义对这三个问题都进行了关联并作出了某种推导。但是,它们的关联和推导并非是毫无疑问的,批判法学对自由主义的理解也是值得推敲的。本文将分
The maintenance of certain objective values, the guarantee of freedom and the proper neutrality among pluralistic values seem to be included in the notion of modern rule of law. However, for the objective value, whether freedom and neutrality can coexist, there is fierce debate between criticizing jurisprudence and liberalism. Their debates revolve around three important issues: first, neutral issues; second, the relationship between neutrality and value subjectivity; third, neutrality, the relationship between subjectivity of value and objectivity of law. Critical jurisprudence and liberalism are all related to these three issues and made some deduction. However, their connection and deduction are not without doubt. Criticizing jurisprudence’s understanding of liberalism is also worth considering. This article will be divided