在许多文稿的眉头上,常常看到领导签署的这样一句话:“请秘书在文字上把关”。“在文字上把关”。既谦虚,又尊重,虽放权,但难弄。“在文字上把关”。无非是纠正错别字,改正用错的标点符号,修改病句之类。难道这些仅仅是文字上的关吗?言为心声,每一个词句和标点,都表达一定的意思,一改一动,意思不就变了?意思一变,就超出“文字把关”的范围了。那还能改吗? “在文字上把关”。那些违背政策规定的、不符合客观实际的怎么办?有一份分配化肥的通知稿 In many brows, I often see such a sentence signed by leaders: “Please let the secretary check the letter.” “Check on the word.” Both modest, but also respect, although decentralization, but hard to get. “Check on the word.” Is nothing more than correct typos, correct the wrong punctuation, modify the sick sentence and the like. Is this just a word off? Words as the voice, every word and punctuation, have expressed a certain meaning, a change of a move, the meaning does not change? A change of meaning beyond the scope of the “word checks.” That can change? “Check on the text.” Those who violate the policies and regulations, do not meet the objective reality of how to do? Have a distribution of fertilizer notice