南京首开地方政府直接干预房价的举措,在社会上引起如此之大的反响和争议,这恐怕是政策制订者始料未及的。对此举措,正、反两方针锋相对的态度也令人咋舌。在新华网进行的讨论中,有不少网友纷纷表示:“南京市物价局是‘依法行政’,政府对于关系绝大部分主体的普通住宅的价格管理干预是应当和必要的,政府这次对房市的干预很正确的”。“房地产的暴利,已严重侵害人民的基本生存权利,政府应强硬起来,维护社会正义与公平。”但也有人表示:“在市场经 Nanjing’s first initiative of local governments to intervene in house prices has aroused so much repercussions and controversy in the community, which is probably beyond the expectations of policymakers. As to this measure, the relative attitude of the two sides is also astounding. During the discussions held on Xinhuanet, many netizens said: ”The Nanjing Price Bureau is ’administering according to law’ and the government should and should be concerned with the price management intervention of ordinary residential houses with most of the relations. This time, the government Intervention on the housing market is correct “. ”Real estate profits have seriously infringed upon people’s fundamental right to subsistence, and the government should be tough and uphold social justice and fairness.“ However, some people also said: ”In the market economy