论文部分内容阅读
刑事法治打击腐败需要刑法与刑诉法的双重运用,而刑法中犯罪论体系与刑诉法中证据体系又都各自有其局限,使得打击腐败的刑事法治理论在实践中难免产生诸多问题。主要表现在:多元化犯罪论理论与一元化司法实践之冲突;传统犯罪构成主观的思辨导致被告人“口供”证据的强势运用;传统的犯罪构成不利于对案件事实及其证据类型进行合理区分;“主客观相统一”原则与证明标准的主客观层面不协调。为解决上述难题,坚持犯罪论体系与证据体系结构层次和逻辑推理的一致性,才可能实现刑法与刑诉法协调交互的一体化机制。
Criminal law to fight corruption requires the dual application of criminal law and criminal procedure law. However, both the criminal theory system and the evidence system in the Criminal Procedure Law have their own limitations, making the theory of criminal law to combat corruption inevitably have many problems in practice. Mainly manifested in: the theory of diversified crime and the unity of the judicial practice of the conflict; constitute a traditional crime of subjective thinking led to the defendant “confession ” the strong use of evidence; traditional crime is not conducive to justify the facts of the case and the type of evidence Distinguish; subjective and objective uncoordinated principles and standards of proof. In order to solve the above problems and insist on the consistency of criminal theory system and evidence hierarchy and logical reasoning, it is possible to realize the integrated mechanism of coordinated interaction between Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law.