How does dialogic reading works for the children who have the literacy difficult

来源 :校园英语·上旬 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ytlytl1009
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  【Abstract】Dialogic reading is one of interventions for the children who have the literacy difficult, this paper is explained the Vygotsky’s zone of proximal and Bandura’ s social learning theory behind this intervention and explained why it works for the children who has the literacy difficult.
  【Key words】dialogic reading, Vygotsky’s zone of proximal; Bandura’ s social learning theory
  【作者簡介】王逸茗(1990-),女,回族,英国诺丁汉大学,教育学专业硕士。
  Ⅰ.Introduction
  Most of the children can improve their vocabulary very quickly during the preschool age (Anglin 1993), but for some of the children, vocabulary acquisition is more complicated. The individual difference in vocabulary development may have a long-term effect, and the vocabularies are also played an essential role in children’s literacy development. So, the early intervention for children with slow vocabulary development is necessary (Hargrave and Sénéchal, 2000). Dialogic reading is one of the interventions try to help children who have the literary difficult. It is first to come up by Whitehurst et al. (1988), it is a particular way of sharing reading through multiple group reading and small group discussion. Adults by using strategic questioning and responding to encourage children to talk when they are reading the books to improve their vocabulary eventually (Doyle and Bramwell, 2006). This paper explained the Vygotsky’s zone of proximal and Bandura‘s social learning theory about dialogic reading and why it works as an intervention for children who have the literary difficult.
  Ⅱ.Zone of proximal development
  Vygotsky developed a zone of proximal development in the late 1920s. Vygotsky thinks Children have at least two development level. The first level is the current development level of students, and the second level is the higher level of problem-solving with the help of others under the guidance. The difference between these two levels is called the “zone of proximal development” (Shabani, Khatib and Ebadi, 2010). In other words, Vygotsky’s believes that with an adult’s help, children can learn new skills. But it seems like the Wertsch (2008) have different options, he believes that in order to achieve the level of self-regulation about the skills, the child must be able to fully understand the words, context situations, and instructions of the task to make sure that the Children establish and maintain consistency between their actions and adults’ speech. In other words, when adults try to help the child, they need to know the child’s understanding of the current situation.   Lonigan et al. (2007) pointed out what the adults need to do during the reading, first by asking the simple questions which the children can answer them individually to start to build the conversation with the children. Second, adults can start to ask children some open questions, during this stage the adults can provide some help for the children to answer these questions. Such as explaining the meaning of target words. Explain the meaning of the words to the children will have more significant gains in the vocabulary than just read them (Elley 1989). Third, after repeating reading the story to the children, they start knowing the story better, and the adults can start asking more deeper questions and encourage them to learn new vocabularies and be able to retell the stories. During the dialogic reading, adults also need to adjust the reading style, and the questions based on the child’s existing language level, then provide help for their literary development (Hargrave and Sénéchal, 2000). There are three principles during dialogic reading. They are evocative techniques, adults’ feedback and progressive change (Arnold et al., 1994). Adults asking questions and give feedback, correcting, modeling and encourage the children to finish some challenging tasks. Based on these strategies, dialogic reading can help children to improve their literacy.
  Ⅲ.Social learning theory
  Bandura (1976) thinks the complex behavior of human beings is formed after birth. Some of the behavior is genetic, and some are affected by the environment. Based on his social learning theory, he thinks that the information can be pass in two different ways, first is learn from the direct experience and the second is learning it from the indirect way which means by observing others (Bajcar and B?bel, 2018).
  There are two ways to learn new words, one is learning from the direct meaning of the phrase (Stahl 1997), the other is learning from the verbal contexts (Elley1989). The greatest advantage of dialogic reading is the children can learn the words in the story context (Penno et, al. 2002). Robbins and Ehri (1994) found out that when the children listening to the stories twice without the adults explain the meaning of the new words they can still acquire new vocabulary. The characteristics of dialogic reading are guiding the conversation in a small group, and repeat reading will provide a meaningful environment for the children to learn the vocabulary (Doyle and Bramwell, 2006).   When adults are doing the dialogic reading with children, the book also has the potential to link the children with the characters’ experience (Doyle and Bramwell, 2006). Children can learn certain skills from the characters, what to do and how to do it (Ladd
其他文献
真正有效的品德课堂教学需要灵动。那么,如何促进品德课堂教学变得灵动有效呢?基于品德课程“生活性、活动性、综合性、开放性”的基本理念,从教材出发但不拘泥于教材,创造性地“活”化教材不失为一条有效途径。基于这样的认识,品德课堂教学设计可沿着将教材立体化、动态化以及开放化的思路来展开,从而切实提高品德教学的有效性。  《雷雨来了》是苏教版与中图版一年级下册“火热的夏天”主题单元中的一课。其教学目标大致可
【摘要】英语是初中学习阶段难度比较高的一门学科,而且由于目前世界趋于国际化的形势,导致英语变得越来越重要。但是因为我国应试教育的原因,大部分学生的英语并不是很好,甚至不喜欢学习英语,而英语不错的学生基本上掌握的也都是“哑巴英语”。针对这一现象,本文就探究了如何通过课堂导入的策略来增加学生学习英语的兴趣,以此提高学生的成绩。  【关键词】初中英语;课堂导入;策略  【作者简介】易文香,湖南省邵阳市隆
2010年11月5日,广东省中山市教育局和公安局联合在石岐中心小学举行了中山市校园网上警务室开通仪式。  校园网上警务室是全国警校合作的首创之举,是中山中小学开展警民共建的新形式,也是在新形势下搭建的一座学校、公安、家庭之间的“连心桥”、“便民桥”。长期以来,中山市委、市政府十分重视校园安全、师生安全的工作,在市综治委牵头下,联合公安、教育、工商、文化、卫生、城管等部门,经常开展校园周边治安环境专
陈文海:德育应回归生活世界的或然向度  陈文海在《教育学术月刊》2012年第6期撰文指出,当前,不论是理论探讨还是实践运行,都多把回归生活世界划分为实然和应然两个向度,这大大消减了学生主体的多样性和生活本身的无限可能性。在实然与应然的张力结构之间,应存在一种或然向度,指向人的可能生活。  为此,应重构学校生活,让教育成为一种可能生活。首先,可能生活是“具体个人”的可能生活。教育对人的尊重必须体现在
[设计理念]  责任心是人格的重要组成部分,是孩子做人、成人的基础。从小培养学生的责任心对其健康人格的形成具有重要意义。本活动力求使学生意汉到承担责任的重要性,学会增强责任心的方法,提高心理素质。  [活动目的]  1,明晰承担责任的重要性  2提高责任意识  [活动重点]  感受或体验勇于承担责任的重要性  [适合年级]小学五年级  [活动内容]    一、暖身活动,感知责任  1.明确游戏规则
思想品德课的复习,重在帮助学生基于已经获取的知识信息,通过构建知识体系的生成和分析能力的培养,运用所学的基础知识,对社会生活实践、社会问题(现象),经过质疑和探究获得理论,反过来再运用理论知识来解释社会现象。这一过程是经由教师的主导作用,让学生成为课堂教学的主体,通过学生对教材的感知、理解,以及对知识的巩固和应用来完成的。学习的主要目的不是要记住教师和教科书上所讲的内容,而是要学生参与建立该学科的
为了尽可能缩短教学与儿童生活世界的距离,基于生活德育的理念,品德课程(包括《品德与生活》以及《品德与社会》)从创设之初就提倡“回归生活”的课程理念。它内在地蕴含着相互交织在一起的两方面内涵:既要求重视开发和利用生活中的道德资源,通过生活实践来进行道德教育,又指出德育的终极价值应回归到学生的日常生活,提升其道德生活质量。新课程改革推行的这十余年来,教师们通过接受培训、自我学习以及教学探索,已基本接受
“行知班”特色文化经营是指在班级日常学习、生活中,有意识地引用陶行知的教育思想元素来更新班集体建设的理念,进而建构具有“行知”特色的班级环境文化、制度文化、活动文化。    一、用行知语言营造“行知”特色环境文化    1 张贴“行知”语录  陶行知先生的许多语言体现他的教育思想,揭示教育规律,如“行是知之始,知是行之成”“发明千千万,起点是一问”“千教万教,教人求真;千学万学,学做真人”等。学生
课间,苗智媛(以下皆为化名)同学焦急地跑到办公室来向我“报案”,说她那部价值千元的音乐播放器丢失了。  很快,教室失窃的消息以令人吃惊的速度散播开来。这是我班发生的第一起“窃案”,且“涉案金额”巨大!尽管表面上风平浪静,但班里处处弥漫着猜疑。一夜之间,这群面庞青涩的少男少女就仿佛以一种令人不安的速度“长大了”——以前喧腾欢快的教室变得安静了不少,一股莫名的力量把原本亲密无间的欢愉割裂,三五成群的小
孩子就是一本书,从童年到少年,从少年到青年,我们都在一页一页往下翻,但要真正读懂它却十分不容易。一位哲人曾说过:推动摇篮的手就是推动地球的手。这精辟的话语无疑是在启示我们,让班级生活擦亮孩子的人生,这是一个十分有价值的命题。那么,如何才能擦亮孩子的人生,让孩子能茁壮成长呢?下面笔者就将自己班级管理中几件“轶事”的所思所得全盘托出,与同仁共享。    养成教育不可忽视    轶事1:垃圾桶的故事