论文部分内容阅读
由于设计、生产时间紧迫,仓促上马的司登冲锋枪外观相当粗糙。虽然英军不得不大量采用司登系列冲锋枪,但一直认为其与英国军队悠久的历史和良好的传统不够相符,有损英军的威严形象,因此迫切要求开发一种外形能够与英军形象相符的冲锋枪。为了迎合这种需求,很多公司都不遗余力,一时间出现了很多产品,比如有的在司登冲锋枪基础上增加了木制枪托和竖直握把等。斯特林武器公司则决定针对英军的新需求,着手对兰彻斯特Mk.1冲锋枪重新加以改造。斯特林武器公司双管齐下,一方面请兰彻斯特继续负责由他研制的兰彻斯特Mk.1冲锋枪的改进——这就是本刊上期介绍的M1、M2试制型;另一方面,公司又委任设计师乔治·韦利亚姆·帕切特同时启动这项改进工作——
Due to the design, production time is tight, hastily launched Division submachine gun looks very rough. Although the British army had to resort extensively to the Sentinel series of submachine guns, it had always believed that it was not in keeping with the long history and good traditions of the British army and undermined the dignified image of the British army. Therefore, it was urgently demanded that a profile be developed that would match the British image Submachine gun. In order to meet this demand, many companies spare no effort and many products appeared over time. For example, some have added wooden buttstock and vertical grips to the division submachine guns. Stirling Arms Company decided to revive the Lanchester Mk.1 submachine gun in response to the new British demand. Stirling Armstrong’s two-pronged approach, on the one hand, asked Lanchester to continue to be responsible for the improvement of the Lanchester Mk.1 submachine gun developed by him - this is the M1, M2 prototype introduced in this issue; on the other hand, the company Also commissioned by the designer George Veliam Pacet at the same time to start this improvement -