论文部分内容阅读
小学新课程标准明确规定,工具性不在是语文唯一属性,语文学科的人文性得到了应有的尊重,尽管是试行,但语文教育的观念毕竟向前迈进了一大步。但面对这场如火如荼的变革,我们教师是否就在思想深处认同了语文教学的现状了呢?有没有在众多的教改范例中真正思考过呢?对于那些专家或权威人士所提出的教学模式怀疑过吗?我们是不是在日常闲谈中经常埋怨现在的语文教学,对其充满不解,甚至是愤怒,而一走进课堂就成了一个循规蹈矩的人呢?
The standard of primary school new curriculum clearly stipulates that instrumentalism is not the sole attribute of Chinese language, and the humanism of Chinese subject has received the due respect. Although it is a pilot project, the concept of Chinese education has, after all, taken a big step forward. However, in the face of this swift change, have our teachers recognized the status quo of Chinese teaching in the depths of their thoughts? Have they really thought about it in the numerous educational reform paradigms? For the teaching models proposed by experts or authorities Doubt? We are not in daily chat often complain about the current language teaching, its full of puzzled, or even angry, and entered the classroom became a regular person?