某厂三位党员,而且是党的干部,不听从组织的劝告,不考虑自己作为一个党员干部应对原所在的社会主义企业应负的责任,不爱惜共产党员的崇高名誉,借口人才可以流动,不辞而别地走了。有关报纸对他们的行为提出异议,他们居然告到法院,说是侵害了他们的名誉权!这本来就令人吃惊了。然而,在讨论这三位党员的问题时,还有人认为这不是什么问题,说人才流动是合理的,要从党的政策的角度,用改革开放的眼光看问题等等。这就更令人吃惊了,禁不住要问:改革开放了,党的政策宽松了,改革开放了,是否等于说,共产党员 A party of three Party members, but also the party’s cadres, do not obey the organization’s advice, do not consider themselves as a member of the cadres to deal with the responsibility of the original socialist enterprises should not cherish the noble reputation of party members, excuses for the flow of talent, Leave without hesitation. The newspaper challenged their actions, and they actually came to the court to say that they infringed their reputation rights! This was surprising. However, when discussing the three party members, some people think that this is not a problem. It is reasonable to say that the mobility of talents should be based on the party’s policy and from the perspective of reform and opening up. This is even more surprising. We can not but ask: After the reform and opening up, the party’s policies were relaxed and the reform and opening up was tantamount to saying that communists