本文根据Talmy的注意力窗口化理论对汉语和韩国语中的移动动词“■”、“■”和“来”、“去”进行了对比。结果表明,韩国语比汉语的移动动词路径窗口化程度更高,这一特征在路径的末端部分表现得尤为明显。两种语言之所以存在差异,一是因为两个民族在话语中对听话者、说话者以及话语所涉及的主题对象之间关系的关照程度不同,二是因为两个民族在观察运动路径时的视角方式不同。 In this paper, Talmy’s attention window theory is used to compare the mobile verbs “”, “” and “” to “and” to "in Chinese and Korean. The results show that Korean mobile verbs are more window-oriented than Chinese and this feature is particularly evident at the end of the path. The difference between the two languages ​​is that the two peoples have different degrees of concern about the relationship between the listener, the speaker and the subject matter involved in the discourse in the discourse. The second reason is that when the two peoples observe the movement path Different perspectives.